What the Paper Proves
The argument begins with a single demand: that the laws of physics look identical in all inertial frames. From this one symmetry requirement, the paper derives the full family of possible space-time transformation groups. The family is parameterised by a single real number κ.
Three cases emerge: κ negative (rotational, Euclidean geometry, no causality), κ zero (the Galilean group, no speed limit), and κ positive (the Lorentz group, lightcones, a universal speed). The paper then deploys the Killing form (a tool from 1888 Lie theory) to show that κ must be positive. The sign is not an assumption. It is demanded by the structure of the symmetry group itself.
Once κ is known to be positive, the transformation equations carry their own internal speed: V = 1/√κ. This is a universal speed limit, derived entirely from symmetry. No measurement was needed to prove it exists. Experiment measures its value. That is all.
The Killing Form of the κ-family
The rotation block is always compact. What changes with κ is the boost block. For κ < 0, both sectors are compact and the algebra is so(4). For κ = 0, the boost block vanishes and the algebra becomes iso(3), degenerate on boosts. For κ > 0, rotations remain compact while boosts become non-compact, yielding the Lorentz algebra so(3,1), an indefinite Killing form, lightcones, and a finite invariant speed V = 1/√κ. This is the verdict Pauli said could not be reached.
The full derivation appears in the paper. The interactive chapters on this site trace each step from postulate to proof.
The Author
Emad Mostaque
Intelligent Internet
Emad Mostaque is the founder of Intelligent Internet. In this paper, he explores the mathematical foundations of physics from first principles, arguing that the speed of light never needed to be postulated independently. It follows from the symmetry structure itself, and experiment serves only to measure its value.
"Experiment is needed to measure that speed, not to establish its existence. Einstein needed one postulate, not two."
— Emad Mostaque, One Postulate, Intelligent Internet, 2026Bibliography
- 1.
Ignatowski, W. von. "Einige allgemeine Bemerkungen über das Relativitätsprinzip." Physikalische Zeitschrift. 1910.
- 2.
Pauli, W. "Theory of Relativity." Pergamon Press. 1921.
- 3.
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. "One more derivation of the Lorentz transformation." American Journal of Physics. 1976.
- 4.
Silagadze, Z. K. "Relativity without tears." Acta Physica Polonica B. 2008.
- 5.
Drory, A. "The necessity of the second postulate in special relativity." Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2015.
- 6.
Mostaque, E. "One Postulate." Intelligent Internet. 2026.